Smart Motorways Kill initial response to the ‘response’
The Parliamentary Transport Select Committee and the Government announced the following today, in relation to smart motorways. For context SMK felt the PTSC report, released November last year, was diluted and didn’t focus at all on the immediate dangers that smart motorways pose and that the government were always going to do the bear minimum, in order to protect it’s million pound contract generating scheme.
With a weak starting point it was no surprise to receive a weak response. In the last 2 and half years there’s has been at least 20 ministerial/official/government/ombudsmen’s/ – reports/reviews/stocktake into smart motorways.
We are paying a lot of people to spend a lot of time to sit and talk.
While people die on these roads.
There is a lot of grey areas and holes in today announcement.
- When are the inoperable cameras/sensors currently in place, due to be operational?
- Why are they continuing to open s.m with out the technology in place, despite promises and press release vowing not to do this?
- What of the software (Dynac) issues currently in-house? How is that due to be resolved?
- What dates are the retrofit ERA’s due to be completed by?
- etc
- etc
- etc
As usual its all just talk and compromise’s, while people die.
- None of the below will help you if you break down in a live running lane
- None of the below will help you in the 2 seconds you have before the vehicle behind slams into you
- None of the below will help anyone when the emergency services need to get to an incident, but all four lanes are packed solid.
I have added notes (in bold) for more context to the below.
Official Announcement from the Government
| Smart motorway rollout to be paused as Government responds to Transport Committee report |
| · Rollout of new All Lane Running smart motorway schemes will be paused until five years of safety data available
What the plans are for these 5 years? What proactive actions do they have lined up to combat any findings? · Current stretches of smart motorway to be further upgraded with best-in-class technology and resources This has been promised in front of parliamentary committee after parliamentary committee since 2013, and has never happened yet. · £900 million commitment to ensure drivers feel safe and confident, including extra £390 million to install additional emergency areas How far will the £390m go? How has this figure been arrived at, and what is budgeted for? When is it in budget for? Is this £390m to be used over the span of 5 years? If so, that is less than £80m a year. For context, we were told it costs circa £30m per motorway mile, so £80m really doesn’t sound much. |
| The rollout of new smart motorway schemes will be paused until a full five years’ worth of safety data is available, as the Department for Transport invests £900 million to improve safety on existing All Lane Running (ALR) motorways.
In line with the Transport Committee’s most recent recommendations, the rollout of new ALR smart motorways will be paused until a full five years’ worth of safety data becomes available for schemes introduced before 2020. After this point, the Government will assess the data and make an informed decision on next steps. The PTSC version of this announcement states “Where work is already under way on smart motorways, additional emergency refuge areas and Stopped Vehicle Detection will be installed where possible” so not all new s.m project will be stopped, just some and all existing s.m will continue to run. So 5 years data is needed, but not for all roads?? surely if its needed, its needed. Although available data shows smart motorways are comparatively the safest roads in the country in terms of fatality rates, while their rollout is paused, the Government will go further by ensuring current smart motorways without a permanent hard shoulder are equipped with best-in-class technology and resources to make them as safe as possible. This will include investing £390 million to install more than 150 additional Emergency Areas so drivers have more places to stop if they get into difficulty. This will represent around a 50% increase in places to stop by 2025, giving drivers added reassurance. The Department for Transport has welcomed the Transport Committee’s report, which endorsed its focus on further upgrading the safety of existing ALR smart motorways rather than reinstating the hard shoulder. As concluded by the Committee, evidence suggests hard shoulders do not always provide a safe place to stop, and by reducing motorway capacity, they could put more drivers and passengers at risk of death or serious injury if they were to divert onto less safe local roads. “hard shoulders do not always provide a safe place to stop, and by reducing motorway capacity, they could put more drivers and passengers at risk of death or serious injury if they were to divert onto less safe local roads.” its not reducing capacity its keeping it as it was. Proper clarification on how a hard shoulder put motorists at risk has never been forth coming, despite repeated request. . Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said: “One of my first actions as Transport Secretary was to order a stocktake of smart motorways and since then, I have worked consistently to raise the bar on their safety. I am grateful to the Transport Committee and to all those who provided evidence for its work. “While our initial data shows that smart motorways are among the safest roads in the UK, it’s crucial that we go further to ensure people feel safer using them. “feel safer” it moves the problem from the road to the driver, they aren’t dangerous, you just think they are! “Pausing schemes yet to start construction and making multi-million-pound improvements to existing schemes will give drivers confidence and provide the data we need to inform our next steps. I want thank safety campaigners, including those who have lost loved ones, for rightly striving for higher standards on our roads. I share their concerns.” “confidence” its how the roads are perceived, not how they actually operate. . National Highways CEO Nick Harris said: “We have listened to public concerns about smart motorways and we are fully committed to taking forward the additional measures the Transport Committee has recommended. “While we pause those all lane running schemes yet to start construction we will complete the schemes currently in construction, we will make existing sections as safe as they can possibly be and we will step up our advice to drivers so they have all the information they need. “We are doing this because safety is our absolute priority and we want drivers to not just be safer, but also to feel safe on our busiest roads.” The Government’s response to the Transport Committee builds on the significant progress already made against the Department’s 18-point Action Plan to improve smart motorway safety, announced in March 2020, including adding emergency areas and upgrading cameras to detect Red X offences. “significant progress already made against the Department’s 18-point Action Plan” release as the salvation to s.m 2 years ago and 2 years later not one single action point has been implemented and several have been contravened. The measures in the Stocktake and Transport Committee response represent over £900m of improvements in total, including £390m of new money for extra emergency areas, with the remainder of the funding delivering other measures such as Stopped Vehicle Detection and concrete central reservation barriers. More public money paid to private companies from a government department. For a system that will eventually be halted by our judicial review anyway. National Highways will also ramp up communications so drivers have better information about how to drive on smart motorways. again moving the blame, its not their roads that are dangerous, its how you drive While the Department for Transport will be taking forward all the recommendations set out in the Committee’s recommendations, it does not agree with the view that smart motorways were rolled out prematurely or unsafely. All ALR smart motorway schemes are, and will continue to be, subject to high standards of design, risk assessment and construction, followed by detailed monitoring and evaluation once opened to traffic. While further data is being collected, National Highways will continue work to complete schemes that are currently in construction, which will all open with technology in place to detect stopped vehicles. These schemes are all more than 50% completed and halting progress on them now would cause significant disruption for drivers. Design work will also continue on those schemes already being planned, so they are ready to be constructed depending on the outcome of the pause. No preparatory construction work will take place. Also, in line with the Committee’s recommendations, National Highways will pause the conversion of Dynamic Hard Shoulder (DHS) motorways – where the hard shoulder is open at busy times – into All Lane Running motorways, while it investigates alternative ways of operating them to make things simpler for drivers. National Highways will also install technology to detect stopped vehicles on these sections. A promise to end “dangerous and confusing” (Grant Shapps words) Dynamic s.m will now not happen
|
